WAS THE MOON LANDING A HOAX? - CAPT AJIT VADAKAYIL
This post is in response to a request from Eric Dubey.
In my opinion the moon landing was NOT a hoax.
Students with some foundations in Physics and laws of optics will find it very easy to digest what I say below.
It is one of the true episodes , after a series of hoaxes , engineered by the English speaking white man, influenced by criminal Jews --and this includes the reason for BOTH the world wars.
Unfortunately,when you cry wolf too often-- this is what happens.
We must give credit to NASA and the astronauts.
The muffs at NASA tried to improve the quality of the pictures for aesthetic impact and to cock a snook at the Russians , and this is where they screwed it up.
The biggest suspicion was because the utter lack of stars. But then all manned landing happened in lunar day time-- at dawn to be more precise. The stars were outshone by the sun. The soil of moon has NANO particles ( which do NOT follow classical laws ) and this is what you get, though the soil was black.
The shadows played tricks . The moon has no atmosphere. So far away hills appear closer, as the atmospheric laws don't work here. The uneven heights of the ground make some shadows longer. They should NOT have used wide angle lenses. The suits of the astronauts reflected the sun's light, as if they were separate light sources.
A lot is made of the journey through the deadly Van Allen radiation belts. You have to look at it in a relative manner-like a fire walker walking on hot glowing coals. The time of transit at 25000 miles an hour speed is hardly anything. The space craft was protected by aluminium and the trajectory was suitable for this exposure. In any case 94% of the surviving astronauts now suffer from cataract.
When weapon manufacturers boast about bullets piercing steel armour--it is at RIGHT angles. When I was putting steel plates on my ship's bridge wings, my chief engineer who had handled AK47s and the British guards told me that the thickness of the steel plates in NOT enough. I just told them off " On my ship-- this much is enough ".
Then the hoax criers said, the film in the cameras should have melted. When that is NOT the way the laws of thermodynamics works in vacuum. Here heat travels by radiation--and as long as your camera is coated and the film is NOT exposed to direct rays, there is NO problem.
You guys must have seen Red Adiar using mirrored shields to protect themselves from oil rig fire heat. You just need to duck behind the mirror--there is NO need for a fire suit.
One moon day lasts as much as 15 earth days. before things got too hot the astronauts had vamoosed after collecting their rocks. Their space suits had cooling mechanisms.
Then a lot is made out of the US flag fluttering. Well you take out a folded and rolled flag, and put it on a reverse L shaped rod, the initial movements of the fabric with NOT follow the laws of vacuum.
During APOLLO 15 mission astronaut David Scott dropped a feather and a hammer at the same time, to show that he is standing in vacuum.
Now regarding no footprint being laid by the space crafts massive leg-- or lack of dust on the craft feet . The surface moons dust was blown off by the rocket thruster. What is below is hard and tough.
Elsewhere the boots of the astronauts left marks--and they should remain for centuries as there is NO wind or air there.
That is why you can see so many craters. If the wind the surface would have been smooth.
The rocks brought back by USA was given to many nations. I myself saw a rock piece at Calicut, my hometown. We were taken by our school,and we stood in a line with gaping mouths. These rocks are were congruent with the Soviet rock samples, scooped off by unmanned crafts.
It is NO wonder that a furious Buzz Aldrin punched one of the hoax Bart Sibrel criers on his face. No charges were accepted by the court.
Even a old lady will get very violent if some one breaks her car windscreen.
It is about self righteousness.
Here is a 7000 year old Sanskrit chant --Grace and peace!
CAPT AJIT VADAKAYIL
..
This post is in response to a request from Eric Dubey.
In my opinion the moon landing was NOT a hoax.
Students with some foundations in Physics and laws of optics will find it very easy to digest what I say below.
It is one of the true episodes , after a series of hoaxes , engineered by the English speaking white man, influenced by criminal Jews --and this includes the reason for BOTH the world wars.
Unfortunately,when you cry wolf too often-- this is what happens.
We must give credit to NASA and the astronauts.
The muffs at NASA tried to improve the quality of the pictures for aesthetic impact and to cock a snook at the Russians , and this is where they screwed it up.
The biggest suspicion was because the utter lack of stars. But then all manned landing happened in lunar day time-- at dawn to be more precise. The stars were outshone by the sun. The soil of moon has NANO particles ( which do NOT follow classical laws ) and this is what you get, though the soil was black.
The shadows played tricks . The moon has no atmosphere. So far away hills appear closer, as the atmospheric laws don't work here. The uneven heights of the ground make some shadows longer. They should NOT have used wide angle lenses. The suits of the astronauts reflected the sun's light, as if they were separate light sources.
A lot is made of the journey through the deadly Van Allen radiation belts. You have to look at it in a relative manner-like a fire walker walking on hot glowing coals. The time of transit at 25000 miles an hour speed is hardly anything. The space craft was protected by aluminium and the trajectory was suitable for this exposure. In any case 94% of the surviving astronauts now suffer from cataract.
When weapon manufacturers boast about bullets piercing steel armour--it is at RIGHT angles. When I was putting steel plates on my ship's bridge wings, my chief engineer who had handled AK47s and the British guards told me that the thickness of the steel plates in NOT enough. I just told them off " On my ship-- this much is enough ".
Then the hoax criers said, the film in the cameras should have melted. When that is NOT the way the laws of thermodynamics works in vacuum. Here heat travels by radiation--and as long as your camera is coated and the film is NOT exposed to direct rays, there is NO problem.
You guys must have seen Red Adiar using mirrored shields to protect themselves from oil rig fire heat. You just need to duck behind the mirror--there is NO need for a fire suit.
One moon day lasts as much as 15 earth days. before things got too hot the astronauts had vamoosed after collecting their rocks. Their space suits had cooling mechanisms.
Then a lot is made out of the US flag fluttering. Well you take out a folded and rolled flag, and put it on a reverse L shaped rod, the initial movements of the fabric with NOT follow the laws of vacuum.
During APOLLO 15 mission astronaut David Scott dropped a feather and a hammer at the same time, to show that he is standing in vacuum.
Now regarding no footprint being laid by the space crafts massive leg-- or lack of dust on the craft feet . The surface moons dust was blown off by the rocket thruster. What is below is hard and tough.
Elsewhere the boots of the astronauts left marks--and they should remain for centuries as there is NO wind or air there.
That is why you can see so many craters. If the wind the surface would have been smooth.
The rocks brought back by USA was given to many nations. I myself saw a rock piece at Calicut, my hometown. We were taken by our school,and we stood in a line with gaping mouths. These rocks are were congruent with the Soviet rock samples, scooped off by unmanned crafts.
It is NO wonder that a furious Buzz Aldrin punched one of the hoax Bart Sibrel criers on his face. No charges were accepted by the court.
Even a old lady will get very violent if some one breaks her car windscreen.
It is about self righteousness.
Here is a 7000 year old Sanskrit chant --Grace and peace!
CAPT AJIT VADAKAYIL
..
Hello Sir
ReplyDeleteFirst of all a big bow to you for your vast knowledge and making us aware of our real proud history than till now we were reading what these white people wanted us to read
I have read many of your posts and continue to read one by one, the post of Ganesh Babarao Savarkar, Shivkar Bapuji Talpade And the real story of WW2, Story Of Shiva were the best
I am in Papua New Guinea now, when i cross the cemetry, i now feel that here are some of our brothers who laid their lives in the war and survived in such grueling circumstances
Wish if someday can get to see the Rabaul Tunnels
Well, Regarding to this post of yours, i have come across the same topic everywhere on internet where it is said the landings were fake
If the landings were true then why not even.after
So many years of this great accomplishment, ther were no manned missions to The Moon, at this stage we are far much technoogically advanced then what we were in 60's and 70's
By this time we should have had a manned mission to Mars, but we still struggling with robotics missions
Have came across stories of Vimanas being there on Moon and outerspace, this is what had stopped Nasa from carrying further Manned
missions, is this true
Sir, Could you please throw some light on this
Hello Sir
ReplyDeleteFirst of all a big bow to you for your vast knowledge and making us aware of our real proud history than till now we were reading what these white people wanted us to read
I have read many of your posts and continue to read one by one, the post of Ganesh Babarao Savarkar, Shivkar Bapuji Talpade And the real story of WW2, Story Of Shiva were the best
I am in Papua New Guinea now, when i cross the cemetry, i now feel that here are some of our brothers who laid their lives in the war and survived in such grueling circumstances
Wish if someday can get to see the Rabaul Tunnels
Well, Regarding to this post of yours, i have come across the same topic everywhere on internet where it is said the landings were fake
If the landings were true then why not even.after
So many years of this great accomplishment, ther were no manned missions to The Moon, at this stage we are far much technoogically advanced then what we were in 60's and 70's
By this time we should have had a manned mission to Mars, but we still struggling with robotics missions
Have came across stories of Vimanas being there on Moon and outerspace, this is what had stopped Nasa from carrying further Manned
missions, is this true
Sir, Could you please throw some light on this