JURY SYSTEM , SUB-JUDICE , COMMANDER NANAVATI AHUJA SYLVIA CASE, ROTHSCHILD BOLSHEVIK COMMUNIST AGENT BLITZ EDITOR RUSSI KARANJIA - CAPT AJIT VADAKAYIL
Altamas Kabir, was Chief Justice of India for 9 months only. He was the 39th CJI, and is no great icon.
But in a short period of 9 moths, he proved to be the worst Chief Justice of India as per general consensus among lawyers and judges by a poll .
Just weeks before he retired , he tried to trample on Dr Subramanian Swami .
Just a Muslim who tried to bash a Hindu- throwing decorum to the winds .
Who are you?” the Chief Justice Kabir asked Dr Swamy-- in Supreme court .
Dr. Swamy replied that he was a petitioner in person.
STOP PRESS-
Now Altamas kabir must know that Dr Swami was a professor at Harvard University in 1964 , when he was in half pants in a below average Calcutta school.
Dr Swami was elected Member of Parliament 5 times between 1974 and 1999.
In 1990 Dr Swamy was a Cabinet Minister of LAW. This was much before Altamas Kabir became a Judge of Calcutta High Court on August 6, 1990.
Getting back-
I am asking you, who are you?” the judge Altamas Kabir snapped “ You are not an advocate. You have no right to appear. You have no right to argue. What will happen if any person on the road comes and says I want to argue. You might have done it earlier, but we will not allow you. You have no right to argue till I give you that right ”
Before Dr Swamy could respond, pompous upstart Justice Kabir , losing his grace, asked him why he was sitting in the front row.
“You have no right to occupy the first row. Those chairs are meant for lawyers, not for litigants. You have no right to sit there.”
Swamy said if the bench felt he had no right to be in the court, he was willing to leave.
“I am not saying you can’t come to the court, but you have no right to occupy these chairs,” Justice Kabir said, pointing to the front row.
Swamy then said: “There is a collusion here.”
“Be careful about what you are saying,” Justice Kabir said. “What do you mean by collusion?”
Swamy clarified that he meant there was “some collusion outside. They (the Centre) had given an undertaking to Italy that they (the Italian marines) will not be awarded the death sentence”.
Dr Swami , the ex-law minister of India , then walked out , to a stunned audience – the Muslim Judge’s shabby behavior was a bit too much.
Altamas Kabir retired on 18 July 2013.
On 19 October 2012, he granted bail to terrorist Syed Mohammed Ahmed Kazmi, arrested for his alleged involvement in the Israeli embassy vehicle blast case in which an Israeli diplomat's wife was injured.
Pronouncing the order, Justice Kabir said, “We are unable to appreciate the procedure adopted by the Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, which has been endorsed by the High Court and we are of the view that the appellant (Kazmi) acquired the right for grant of statutory bail on July 17, 2012, when his custody was held to be illegal by the additional sessions judge.”
On 18 July 2013, i.e. the day of his retirement, a bench headed by Justice Altamas Kabir has quashed NEET for Medical College entrance.
Supreme Court collegium had stalled Justice Kabir's move to appoint a SC Judge just before his retirement. And Dr Swami has the last laugh--what a disgrace !!!
What is all this?
Why bring Hindu Muslim one-upmanship in the Supreme court.
Altamas Kabir even knows Dr Swami’s wife who did her PhD in Mathematics at Harvard , and is presently an advocate at the Supreme Court of India.
For all his grand standing CJI Altamas Kabir does NOT even know the meaning of the term Sub-judice, as per his own Supreme court judges—
--- for it does NOT apply to India, since the Commander Kawas Manekshaw Nanavati case of 1959 ( shot his wife’s secret Sindhi lover ) , when the JURY SYSTEM was abolished in India.
--- for it does NOT apply to India, since the Commander Kawas Manekshaw Nanavati case of 1959 ( shot his wife’s secret Sindhi lover ) , when the JURY SYSTEM was abolished in India.
I have NOT yet , anybody who knows , that this term SUB-JUDICE is NO longer applicable in India for the past half a century.
How often you have head on TV , big cats , even ex-CJI coming on TV and saying on prime time, “ The case if SUB-JUDICE , I cannot comment “ ( or—you cannot comment ).
Mr I Know It All Arnab Goswami does NOT know, neither does any single member of the main stream media, the politicians – nobody !
As soon as CJI Altamas Kabir retired he went hammer and tongs against TIMES OF INDIA and THE INDIAN EXPRESS for lowering his image ( what fuc#in' image? ).
He vehemently objected to the canards , barbs and innuendos deliberately maligning "his own highness".
He took severe exception to the canard that -
“Gujarat Chief Justice had been denied a berth in the Supreme Court on account of my personal bias towards him because of his objections to my sister’s elevation as a Judge of the Calcutta High Court”.
And he also took double severe exception to the TOI report on 19th July, that he accused his own Judges ( collegium members ) of "ganging up" on him.. Is it because you are squeaky clean, honourable--nay-- venerable Altamas Kabir ( who sees everything though green tinted glasses) ?
Ex- Chief Justice of India Altamas Kabir , clearly suffering from persecution mania also blasted his successor CJI P Sathasivam and demanded an apology. In an exclusive interview to CNN-IBN, he denied any leak of the National Eligibilty cum Entrance Test judgment.
He moans “I'm being targeted may be because I'm no longer having control. I'm certainly being targeted by certain sections ( read that as Hindus )
In an astonishing instance of transparency, The Prime Minister’s Office has confirmed having received a complaint against the former Chief Justice of India Altamas Kabir, which it has forwarded it to the ministries of health and law for “appropriate action, if required.”
In response to an RTI application by activist Subhash Chandra Agrawal, the PMO replied that a complaint by Delhi-based journalist Dr M Furqan was received on July 20 2013.
Furqan also sent his complaint demanding a probe into some of the judgements delivered by the bench headed by Justice Kabir to President Pranab Mukherjee, Vice-President Hamid Ansari, Lok Sabha Speaker Meira Kumar, leader of the opposition in the Lok Sabha Sushma Swaraj and Aam Aadmi Party leaders Arvind Kejriwal and Prashant Bhushan.
The five-page complaint refers to the majority judgement of the SC, delivered by a bench headed by Justice Kabir on July 18, a day before he retired, which scrapped the National Eligibility cum-Entrance Test for admission to MBBS, BDS and post-graduate courses in medical and dental colleges.
Advocate Prashant Bhushan alleged in an interview that the National Eligibility cum Entrance Test -NEET- judgement was leaked from the chambers of ex-Chief Justice of India (CJI) Altamas Kabir to private medical colleges. Kabir denies it vehemently.
Altamas Kabir that the NEET test had the effect of depriving the States, state-run universities and all medical colleges and institutions, including those enjoying the constitutional protection, of their right to admit students to MBBS, BDS and postgraduate courses as per their own procedures, beliefs and dispensations.
So we Indians must continue going to doctors who got their MBBS by paying 85 lakh donation ( management quota is easy if you convert to Christianity ) rather than merit.
Altamas Kabir is the fourth Muslim to occupy the top position after Chief Justice M Hidayatullah, Chief Justice M Hameedullah Beg and Chief Justice AM Ahmadi
It must be said that all the other Muslim CJIs did NOT see everything through GREEN tinted glasses, and India is proud of them.
It must be said that all the other Muslim CJIs did NOT see everything through GREEN tinted glasses, and India is proud of them.
Sahara group companies were ordered to refund Rs 24,000 Crores they had collected through optional fully convertible debentures, to SEBI with 15 per cent interest by November 30, 2012, since they had violated various regulatory norms . This order came from the bench of Justices KS Radhakrishnan and Justice JS Khehar on August 31, 2012.
The judgment was undoubtedly a boost for SEBI in reinstalling its powers as a regulator in the market. Subsequently a bench presided over by our man Altamas Kabir modified the judgment of August 31, 2012 by allowing SAHARA to pay the amounts in installments.
It was a shocking incident for every lawyer and judge in India.
Many legal luminaries came on TV and had criticized this order particularly because final order passed by one bench could not possibly be modified by another bench.
The most brutal rapist ( in the Delhi bus ) was a Muslim minor, who inserted a steel rod in the rectum of the girl and twisted it causing her intestines to come adrift.
Chief Justice of India (CJI) Altamas Kabir remarked that these reports were merely the “hype” created by the media. This was just one example of his GREEN tinted glasses .
“Till know, nobody knows what had exactly happened in the case. How can you say that the minor was the most brutal? Stories terming the juvenile accused as the most brutal were only media hype. It was what people say about the incidence,” the CJI Kabir told the press when specifically asked the theories coming up in the case.
The wife of George Fernandes Leila Kabir is related by blood to Altamas Kabir.
Like Rothschild stooge EVR Periyar, Altamas Kabir ‘s judicial philosophy was influenced by German Jew theorist Friedrich Nietzsche's "aristocratic individualism".
Punch into Google search-
HINDUISM IN BALI, TURN OF TIDE AND HINDU RESURGENCE VADAKAYIL
To find out who German Jew Friedrich Wilhelm Nietzsche is! Rothschild stooge EVR Periyar’s constant cry “God is dead” is actually the cry of Friedrich Wilhelm Nietzsche.
In a judgment in 2008, Altamas Kabir sent a husband to jail for driving his wife to suicide with taunts over her "dark complexion" gender divide at its best.
In 2007, Kabir dismissed the plea that activist Medha Patkar was working for foreign powers.
We Indians know the source of her foreign funds and awards , including the Zionist Goldman award.
We also know why she was in favour of the Jaitapur Nuclear Plant , in her own Konkan.
We Indians know , why Kabir’s Muslim family migrated to India from Faridpur Bangladesh where they held lot of land , while most of the Indian Bengali Muslims fled to Bangladesh. The story is that Humayun Kabir decided to settle in India at the behest of his Hindu wife Shanti Kabir.
Humayun the uncle of Altamas Kabir, was the Minister of State for Civil Aviation, Education Minister of India twice, under the Prime Ministership of Jawaharlal Nehru.
I will leave this here .
Let it be !
Before the Commander Nanavati case Indian courts had a Jury system.
Parsi Nanavati killed his British wife Sylvia as she had a sexual affair with his rich and handsome Sindhi friend Ahuja. Sylvia was deeply in love with Ahuja and was hankering to marry him.
The 8 member jury was influenced by bribes and immense propaganda by fellow Parsi Russi Karanjia’s newspaper tablet BLITZ.
RK Karanjia converted sunset to sunrise, night to day. He converted Nanavati to a Mills and Boons hero and Ahuja into the snake in the grass.
Karanjia was trained by Rothschild in England to be a Bolshevik communist reporter..
Karanjia was trained by Rothschild in England to be a Bolshevik communist reporter..
See a man killed another man. But the jury set him free by a 8-1 vote count. Two Parsees , two Christians and five Hindus. The judge was resourceful enough to take immediate charge and convict Nanavati.
Jury members were randomly selected from public . In the Nanavati case, the Jury was compromised.
Jury members can be influenced by the press , TV or discussions in legislatures .
Now Indian jurisprudence has no jury system .
Judges are totally independent and governed only by the law of the land .
So why do still Indian press , TV and legislatures avoid discussion claiming the matter is "sub judice" ?
Answer—they are ignorant and stupid.
The Nanavati murder case was showcased by a Bollywood movie in 1973 , starring Vinod Khanna. This intense movie about an extra marital affair and revenge murder has no songs.
In Porstmouth, England in 1949 an 18 year old English woman met a 24-year old Indian Navy commander Kawas Nanavati. He was an alumnus of the Royal Navy College in Dartmouth.
She could see that he was a blue eyed boy, as he worked for the High Commissioner ( later Defence minister ) Krishna Menon, as a military attaché to Britain, who had friends in high places, including the family of then Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru. Indira Gandhi’s husband was Parsi.
Nanavati had been awarded many medals for gallantry , almost all of them recommended by Lord Louis Mountbatten, whose wife was Rothschild.
After a brief period of courtship and romance Commander Kawas Nanavati proposed to Sylvia, and she gave her assent.
Soon they were married in England and then they went to Mumbai , which was a strange land with strange new people for the young Englishwoman.
Nanavati belonged to the elite social circuit , and all its glamour and dazzle unfolded before Sylvia who came from simple meat and potato trappings . On the social circuit, Sylvia was introduced to the handsome Prem Ahuja, a dashing rich businessman and his sister Mamie Ahuja.
Prem, Mamie Kawas and Sylvia became close friends and visited each other quite often. Sylvia would often visit Ahuja in his home, where he lived with his sister.
The Nanavatis lived in Cuffe Parade. Ahuja's opulent and posh apartment building on Nepean Sea Road ( Jeevan Jyoti ) was in the most exclusive and affluent Malabar Hill neighbourhood.
Soon Sylvia felt the need for some romance . Her sexual life was NOT exciting anymore and she was bored with three children. The long lonely days and nights were getting to her.
Soon she fell head over heels in love with Ahuja, who pampered her with expensive gifts. Ahuja was the life of every party and was an excellent dancer and all women loved to dance with him.
Nanavati noticed that his wife wore diamonds that he could NOT afford , neither could this lower middle class English girl.
Nanavati noticed that his wife wore diamonds that he could NOT afford , neither could this lower middle class English girl.
Sylvia, by now wanted to marry Ahuja and was looking for a divorce from Nanavati . In 1959, Nanavati and Ahuja were both 34 years of age and Sylvia was 28. Ahuja did NOT want to marry her unless she got a clean divorce from her husband.
One day on 18thApril, Commander Nanavati came home without announcement from his ship INS Mysore. He found a half finished love letter from his wife to Ahuja, and his world fell apart.
“…Don’t ever let me go, my darling and please don’t ever stop loving me. I do crazy things sometimes and can’t always show you how much you mean to me, but one day, my love, I will show you that you are more than life to me and dearer to me than anyone…” It was a long letter, every paragraph showing how much she loved.
This letter was read out in court.
Dozens of her feverish Mills and Boon love letters were produced by Ahuja’s sister in court. She writes of her craving just to listen to his voice, to be held in his arms, to share a oneness with him…( some of it was XXX )
Ahuja had never written to her even once-- rather he was fed up of her constant demand for attention and sex..
In a letter dated May 24, 1958, produced in court , Sylvia wrote “Last night when you spoke of your marrying and the various other girls you might marry, something inside me snapped and I knew I could not bear the thought of your loving someone else…”
Nanavati accosted Sylvia , how could she do this to him and the 3 children . She cooly told him that she loved Ahuja wants a divorce.
After a terrible tongue lashing and melodrama, Nanavati had lunch and he took his wife and children for a movie Tom Thumb in Metro theatre. Nanavati was at the wheel and his wife and three children were very quiet, which was NOT normal. The children knew that something was terribly wrong.
Sylvia sat quietly in front, preoccupied and sullen.
Nanavati pulled into Metro Theater, told his family to go in and watch the movie and said that he would pick them up at the end of the show at 1800 hrs.
Nanavati then drove to the Naval base, collected his pistol on a false pretext from the stores along with six cartridges, completed his official duties and proceeded to Ahuja's office, at Universal Motors , a Willy's Jeep showroom at Pedder Road. The clerk put the gun in a sealed brown paper bag, with his name on it.
On not finding Ahuja there , he drove straight to his flat in Setalvad Lane off Napean Sea Road, near Malabar hill and rang the bell.
Anjani Rapa, a maid opened. She knew Nanavati and his family were VERY close friends of the Ahujas. When asked where Prem Ahuja was, she nonchalantly said, "Bedroom".
When Nanavati opened the door of the bedroom, Ahuja wrapped in a towel, walked out of the bathroom. He shot him thrice in quick successsion.. Nanavati walked out of the apartment, past the anguished cries of Mamie, his very good friend of the past.
Nanavati's clothes were stain or struggle free. He was composed enough so as to drive to the home of the Navy Provost Marshall of WNC to confess. He was told to turn himself in to the Deputy Commissioner of Police.
He had calmly unloaded the gun and corrected the spelling of his name at the police station. The police found Ahuja dead with his loosely wrapped towel intact.
He had calmly unloaded the gun and corrected the spelling of his name at the police station. The police found Ahuja dead with his loosely wrapped towel intact.
On April 27, 1959 this bizarre "crime of passion" sent shockwaves rippling through Bombay. A Parsi had murdered a Sindhi in cold blood. His sister and the maid heard the three consecutive shots.
The case soon turned it into a Parsi vs Sindhi community confrontation. Karl Khandalavala became the representative of the Parsi community fighting for the Parsi commander and Ram Jethmalani of the Sindhi community backing the deceased Prem Ahuja.
There were huge demonstrations from the Parsi community in Nanavati's favour. Tabloid Blitz led by Russy Karanjia painted Nanavati as a honourable hero and Prem Ahuja as a black hearted knave.
The affluent Parsi community went ballistic, holding meetings and marches demanding the lesser charge be brought, and upholding the naval officer as a great defender of family values. Remember Ahuja had never raped Sylvia, it was she who piled on him for sex and favours.
Blitz did a blitzkrieg under the cunning RK Karanjia. How could he, such a nice ghenchoo , be accused of murder when his wife was cheating on him while he was protecting the nation?
Blitz ran a tireless campaign for him, with ample help from Rothschild’s main stream media and the Anglo Indians waving British flags .
Such was the Hasbara generated that gunned own Prem Ahuja, has support only of his own Sindhi community and his own sister Mamie Ahuja, who sought death for the much celebrated naval officer, and his adulteress and over sexed English wife Sylvia.
Nanavati received over zealous backing of the Parsi Panchayat and had a powerful Parsi lawyer Karl Khandavala fighting his case.
The Jury acquitted Nanawati 8-1. The courtroom packed with stooges by RK Karanjaia with Parsis , and Anglo Indians erupted in wild cheers and whistles.
But Sessions judge Ratilal Bhaichand Mehta brought the noisy celebration to an abrupt halt. He declared that the jury verdict was "perverse" , that there is travesty in justice , in the light of the evidence marshaled in the trial and referred the case to the Bombay High Court.
The High Court found Nanavati guilty of homicide amounting to murder and sentenced him to life in prison. The Supreme Court upheld the decision on November 11, 1961. Justice YV Chandrachud held all through that Nanavati was guilty of murder and ruled so. He retired as the Chief Justice of India.
Ram Jethmalani's services were sought to persuade Ahuja’s sister Mamie to give in writing a no objection letter , that she had forgiven Nanavati and would not object to his release.
Ram Jethmalani secured this pardon in writing by forcing the Sindhi community to agree that in lieu of dead man Ahuja, he would secure the release of a Sindhi freedom fighter Bhai Pratap, who was charged with arms possession ( all rigged up by Nehru ). Nanavati and Bhai Pratap were granted pardon simultaneously by Governor Vijayalakshmi Pandit.
Immediately after the pardon, Nanavati, Sylvia and the three children slipped away in great secrecy to Canada never to return to India. Nanavati died in Canada at the ripe old age of 76 in 2003. I suggest you have look at his children ( no need for DNA test ) two boys and one girl .
Blitz tabloid converted Ram to Ravan and Ravan to Ram.
Nanavati was converted to a man of great honour fighting for his nation ( in peace time TEE HEEEE ! ) .
Nanavati was converted to a man of great honour fighting for his nation ( in peace time TEE HEEEE ! ) .
Ahuja was converted into a preying womanizer who preferred married woman, and put young Sylvia into a evil spell, which she tried hard to shake off.. SNIFF !
He put words into nanavati’s and Ahuja’s mouths—you see he can fly like a invisible ghost.
Nanavati walked into Ahuja’s bedroom and saw him coming out of the bathroom in a towel.
He confronted him with the inevitable: "Will you marry Sylvia and take care of my 3 children?" ( Oh boy—SNIFF !)
Ahuja, the evil serial offender cried "No. Am I supposed to marry every woman I go to bed with?" ( Bad Ahuja )
“Get out of here before I throw you out" ( Bad Ahuja again )
Then he tried to attack Nanavati. ( Bad baaad Ahuja )
A calm Nanavati , tried to reason –PLEAAASE -- KIIINDDLY-- and then shot him thrice.
Every day of the court session Karanjia would organize Anglo Indian and Parsi girls to scream and swoon as soon as they saw dashing Commander Nanavati ( never mind that he could NOT get it up ) in full white uniform and regalia resplendent with shining medals.
RK Karanjia let the grape vine flow— Bad baaad Ahuja was even humping the air chief ‘s wife and the army chief's wife too, for good measure.
Nanavati’s car would be full of lipstick marks. New 100 rupees noted would be showerd on him, with red lipstick imprints on them.
The entire Naval officer clan closed ranks behind Commander Nanavati— or forget your promotion.
Commodore Nanda ( who became Navy Chief ) gave evidence how Nanavati was such a good shot and how he shot in self defence.
He gave his spin, how when Ahuja suddenly attacked Nanavati , in the struggle that ensued to control the gun, it got accidentally fired ( 3 times TEE HEEEE !) .
He was at a loss to explain why Ahuja’s towel never fell off, or why Nanawati’s clothes was speckless or creaseless.
Blitz went on and on— how dashing Kawas Maneckshaw Nanavati ( never mind he cant get it up) was getting hundreds of proposals from beautiful young girls .
How when Ahuja refused to marry Sylvia, Kawas Maneckshaw Nanavati said out of great inherent Parsi honour , "By God, I am going to thrash you for this" ( or was it BAAYEEE GAAD like how the Punjabis say ?)
Karanjia had painted Ahuja as “a gay Lothario who loved to graze in other people’s pastures”—typical Limey yellow tabloid stuff.
Gamdevi police officers investigating the scene in the crime, wrapped it pretty fast. Witnesses , the sister and the maid, who heard the shots ,and saw the sinking body.
The police photographed the shattered glass in the bathroom, the bloodstains on the wall and door handle. Lying on the floor was "the empty brown envelope bearing the name Lt. Commander K M Nanavati” .
If this is NOT travesty of justice—what could it be?
If you see the Internet, you find all (100%) mouthing the same HASBARA line --
QUOTE --On April 27, 1959, Nanavati returned home from one of his assignments and finding Sylvia aloof and distant, he questioned her---UNQUOTE
When Sylvia was asked in court, why she went to the theatre, leaving her agitated husband behind, she answered, "I was upset myself and I did not think clearly then. I was not indifferent to my husband killing himself… It is difficult to explain these things to children, so I took them to the cinema."
Ahuja was even accused of fobbing off the Nanawatis. A super rich business man rolling around in crores fobbing off a salaried Indian Navy commander earning a few hundred rupees a month in the fifties ?
But in Mumbai most Parsis were affluent.
Reason?
Punch into Google search-
Unknown to the public blue eyed boy Nanavati was relaxing in a pleasure cottage instead of jail most of the time.
While he was walking out of Ahuja’s flat, even the Gurkha watchman asked Nanavati, why he killed Ahuja.
On 17thMarch 1964, Nanavati was “released “ from Lonawala SUNDOWN— a most opulent and luxurious bungalow.
This is what happens when an entire religious community is sponsored by the ruling government— for after all Indira Gandhis’s husband Feroze Gandhi was a Parsi ( sic ! )—and Rothschild loved his ex-drug running agents, the Parsis.
RK Karanjia’s Blitz tabloid wound up in 1998, died in 2008.
In law, sub judice, Latin for "under judgment", means that a particular case or matter is under trial or being considered by a judge or jury.
Concise Oxford Dictionary says sub-judice means “under judicial consideration and hence prohibited from public discussion elsewhere”
It is generally considered inappropriate to comment publicly on cases sub judice, which can be an offence in itself, leading to contempt of court proceedings. This is particularly true in criminal cases, where publicly discussing cases sub judice may constitute interference with due process, with a gullible Jury.
Sub judice is now irrelevant to journalists because of the introduction of the Contempt of Court Act 1981. Under Section 2 of the Act, a substantial risk of serious prejudice can only be created by a media report when proceedings are active.
Sub-judice is only if a jury system exists, as the judge is deemed “not to be “ gullible. It would be sacrilegious even to suggest that the learned judges allow themselves to be swayed by public opinion, especially when our judicial system provides for appeal to higher courts, thus making trial judges acutely conscious of being rapped in their knuckles by the appellate courts.
Judges have even gone on record saying that they keep an eye on media coverage of a case, only to gather more facts and to be able to better sift the grain from the chaff.
Where a jury system exists ( like in USA ) often, contempt of court charges may be brought against journalists who make statements about cases that are sub judice, or yet to be decided.
The fact that writing articles about a case can cause it to be tainted was one reason why published material about pending litigation was sometimes referred to as sub judice in America prior to 1981. In that year, the U.S. Contempt of Court Act was passed. This law states that media coverage of an event is only capable of swaying public opinion during the time of the trial itself. For this reason, newspaper or magazine articles about most cases are no longer referred to with this term.
Many times, court cases are pending for some time before they can be heard by a judge or jury. A matter is typically said to be sub judice from the time the first pleadings or written motions are filed with the court. It is no longer thought to be so once a final decision has been rendered or the case has been dismissed.
Hardly any media or politician in India understands that sub- judice is not relevant in India where the Jury system has been abolished. The term sub-judice, is again and again loosely used by legal luminaries and lawyer-spokespersons of beleaguered political parties whose leaders are under scrutiny.
The concept of sub-judice holds sway only in countries where the system of jury trial is in vogue—read this line thrice.
The jury was largely of hoi polloi was likely to be influenced by the opinion aired in the media and other platforms, by those who are not parties to the case concerned—like in the Nanavati case where a murderer was acquitted by the naïve or corrupt jury.
The concept of sub-judice is innately linked to the jury system. India gave up the jury system in 1960. .after travesty of justice in the Nanavati case , thanks to yellow journalism by RK Karanjia trying to save a fellow Parsi. Karanjia never let the “Nanavati as a wronged husband” story go off the front page for three long years.
Karanjia had even managed to get a replica of evil seducer Ahuja’s skull in the courtroom looking sinisterly at the Jury – and the chaste woman Sylvia, the blue eyed brunette.
Blitz ran an article on December 2, 1961 article headlined ‘The President must pardon Nanavati’: “If a member of the Fighting Forces always has to entertain the fear that some moneyed and leisured man might be consoling his wife, in his absence, he will be more worried than if his pay is not sufficient to meet the regular expenses of his household... People want to ask the top authorities to consider what will be the moral effect on those whom you invite to join the Defence Forces if and when they observe that those in authority take a technical view of the invasion by the wealthy of their unprotected homes.” ( Oh Boy !! )
I piss on RK Karanjia’s grave. Karanjia had turned the murder trial into a fight between the middle-class honourable values of Nanavati and the bourgeois depravation of Ahuja, baffling the gullible jury and the entire nation.
But Oh Boy—this particular Parsi bawaaji wrote in his will that he wanted to be cremated. I suppose he did NOT like the Tower of Silence.
Wanna see some nice vultures pecking the eyes off dead corpses?
Punch into Google search-
SHUKRACHARYA IS AHURA MAZDA GOD OF THE PARSIS, INDIAN PROPHET ZOROASTER WROTE ZEND AVESTA VADAKAYIL
I am sure RK Karanjia knew his own Parsi history before he dies.
In the 1930s RK Karanjia was employed an assistant editor at the Rothschild controlled and owned The Times of India. He left The Times in 1941 to launch Blitz, a weekly tabloid with a focus on investigative journalism, to help Rothschild every which way.
This Rothschild stooge had blanked out the Indian Navy Mutiny.
Punch into Google search-
THE INDIAN NAVY MUTINY OF 1946, THE ONLY WAR OF INDIAN INDEPENDENCE VADAKAYIL
RK Karanjia was sent as a war correspondent by Rothschild during the Japanese Burma offensive in World War II, reporting on the action in Burma and Assam—yeah—Rothschild embedded reporter..
Punch into Google search-
EMBEDDED JOURNALISM , IMMORAL AND FALSE PROPAGANDA BY TRAINED PROFESSIONAL LIARS VADAKAYIL
Karanjia was founder and owner editor of Blitz, a tabloid weekly published from Mumbai. The first issue of Blitz was published on 1 February 1941 .
Before this he was sent for a few years to England by Rothschild to where he served as a trainee in Fleet Street tabloids in a crash course of yellow journalism.
P. Sainath, Magsaysay award winning journalist, and grandson of VV Giri was associated with Blitz. Like Mao Tse Tung’s great long march , he is credited with walking 5,000 km on foot .
Amartya Sen has called him "one of the world's great experts on famine and hunger".
Wanna know who famine expert Amartya Sen is?
AMARTYA SEN GETS NOBEL PRIZE FOR WHITEWASHING CHURCHILL'S INDIAN HOLOCAUST VADAKAYIL
RL Karanjia openly attacked the Congress party, but in secret was VERY friendly with Congress leaders Nehru and Indira Gandhi -- a clear case of running with the hares and hunting with the hounds .
RK Karanaji’s great hero was whose photo remained on his desk till the last day he went to office.
RK Karanjia became disillusioned with Rothschild’s Bolshevik communism . He was the guy who saved atheist Kerala Comunist leader AK Gopalan from the gallows.
Pretty soon he became a strong sympathiser of Hindutva and the Ayodhya movement.
Pretty soon he became a strong sympathiser of Hindutva and the Ayodhya movement.
How many of you know that under the Criminal Procedure Code of 1861, jury trial could be made available in any district and for any offence as the local White invader government saw fit. White subjects were entitled the right to trial by jury ( with a majority of white skinned jurors).
According to one 2008 survey, 55 countries have some form of jury trial, including states as geographically and historically diverse as Mexico, Kazakhastan and South Korea. But till date, India and Pakistan remain constant in their opposition—they abolished the jury system after a decade of Independence..
The jury's function is of tempering blind rules of law by common sense. The jury has been described as "an exciting and gallant experiment in the conduct of serious human affairs."
In the United States, every person accused of a crime punishable by incarceration for more than six months has a constitutional right to a trial by jury. Jurors in some states are selected through voter registration and drivers' license lists.
A form is sent to prospective jurors to pre-qualify them by asking the recipient to answer questions about citizenship, disabilities, ability to understand the English language, and whether they have any conditions that would excuse them from being a juror. If they are deemed qualified, a summons is issued.
The United States Constitution recognize the right to a jury trial to be a fundamental civil liberty or civil right that allows the accused to choose whether to be judged by judges or a jury. In America, it is understood that juries usually weigh the evidence and testimony to determine questions of fact, while judges usually rule on questions of law.
Although a judge can throw out a guilty verdict if it was not supported by the evidence, a jurist has no authority to override a verdict that favors a defendant. A judge cannot order the jury to convict, no matter how strong the evidence is.
A civil jury is typically made up of 6 to 12 persons. In a civil case, the role of the jury is to listen to the evidence presented at a trial, to decide whether the defendant injured the plaintiff or otherwise failed to fulfill a legal duty to the plaintiff, and to determine what the compensation or penalty should be.
A criminal jury is usually made up of 12 members, though fewer may sit on cases involving lesser offenses. Criminal juries decide whether the defendant committed the crime as charged. The sentence may be set by either the jury or the judge; generally, in felony cases the jury sets punishment while in lesser offenses it may be set by the judge.
Verdicts in criminal cases must be unanimous. In civil cases, the law (or the agreement of the parties) may permit a non-unanimous verdict. A jury's deliberations are conducted in private, out of sight and hearing of the judge, litigants, witnesses, and others in the courtroom.
In the majority of US states, there is no right to a jury trial in family law actions not involving a termination of parental rights, such as divorce and custody modifications. The vast majority of US criminal cases are not concluded with a jury verdict, but rather by plea bargain. Both prosecutors and defendants often have a strong interest in resolving the criminal case by negotiation resulting in a plea bargain. If the defendant waives a jury trial, a bench trial is held.
Since the Nanavati case was extensively reported in the media, it was felt that the jury was influenced by the publicity.
Those who have day jobs are eager to avoid serving on juries, mainly because the convoluted rules of procedure and evidence have turned summary trials into week-long events. By and large, only the least offensive -- and not coincidentally, the dumbest -- tend to be selected for juries.
As the aphorism goes, the problem with juries is that they are generally composed of the 12 people too stupid to get out of jury duty - TEEEE HEEEEEEE !.
Most Americans would be willing to serve on a jury for a day. Few would be willing to do so for a week, and none for over a month.
Sometimes jurors are paid a small amount but it is usually much less than they would have earned at their regular job. The judge might ask the jurors to raise their hands if they are friends or acquaintances of any of the people involved in the case. . If a juror gives an answer that the judge agrees shows a lack of impartiality, the juror can be dismissed "for cause."
Jury trials were introduced in Russia in 1864, abolished by the Russian revolution in 1917, and reintroduced in 1993
In the OJ Simpson trial the Jury pool was 40% white, 28% black, 17% Hispanic, and 15% Asian. In this case a black man had allegedly killed his white wife.
Sample questions to jury --
39. While in school, what was your favorite subject?
40. What was your least favorite subject?
162. Have you ever experienced domestic violence in your home, either growing up or as an adult? Please describe the circumstances and the impact it has had upon you.
186. Have you ever dated a person of a different race? Yes? No? If yes, how did you feel about it?
201. Do you have a religious affiliation or preference? Yes? No? If yes, please describe. How important would you say religion is in your life? Would anything about your religious beliefs make it difficult for you to sit in judgement of another person? Yes? No? Possibly? How often do you attend religious services?
202. What is your political affiliation? (Please circle) 1. Democrat 2. Republican 3. Independent 4. Other (please specify)
205. Do you consider yourself politically: Active? Moderately active? Inactive?
211. Have you ever provided a urine sample to be analyzed for any purpose? Yes? No? If yes, did you feel comfortable with the accuracy of the results? Yes? No?
212. Do you believe it is immoral or wrong to do an amniocentesis to determine whether a fetus had a genetic defect? Yes? No? Don’t have an opinion?
215. Did you take science or math courses in college?
222. Do you have (please check) Security bars? Alarms? Guard dog? Weapons for self-protection?
244. What type of books do you prefer? (Example: Non-fiction? Historical? Romance? Espionage? Mystery?)
248. Have you ever written a letter to the editor of a newspaper or magazine? Yes? No? If yes, what was the subject matter of your comment:
251. Which television news shows do you enjoy watching on a regular basis?
252. What are your leisure time interests, hobbies and activities?
254. What accomplishments in your life are you most proud of?
255. What groups ore organizations do you belong to now or have you belonged to for a significant period of time in the past? (For example, bowling leagues, church groups, AA, Sierra Club, MECLA, National Rifle Association, ACLU, YWCA, PTA, NAACP, etc.)
257. Are there any charities or organizations to which you make donations? Yes? No? If yes, please list the organizations or charities to which you contribute:
276. Do you seek out positions of leadership? (Please check answer) Always? Often? Seldom? Never?
277. Please name the three public figures you admire most.
281. Do you own any special knives (other than for cooking), such as hunting or pen knives?
285. Would you like to be a juror in this case?
TEEEE HEEEEEEE !
Jurors can be released from the pool for several reasons including illness, prior commitments that can't be abandoned without hardship, change of address to outside the court's jurisdiction, travel or employment outside the jurisdiction at the time of duty, and others. Work places cannot penalize employees who serve jury duty.
In India there has never been a single case in which a person was prosecuted and PUNISHED for making a false statement before the court. Under Section 191 of the IPC, an affidavit is evidence and a person swearing to a false affidavit is guilty of perjury punishable under Section 193 IPC which prescribes punishment up to seven years imprisonment.
Have you seen the way Teesta Setalvad used Saudi Wahabi funds and produced witnesses out of thin air in court ?
Punch into Google search-
THE WORST JOURNALIST VADAKAYIL
Perjury is regarded as an extremely serious offence all over the world, but in India lying in court is routine. The fear of being jailed for perjury persuades witnesses to tell the truth. If the witness turns hostile, it will amount to perjury with no defence possible, and the judge can convict the witness on the spot. That will surely persuade witnesses that lies are less profitable than the truth.
In Kashmir, NE and Naxal-hit areas, what the State is dealing with is guerrilla war funded by foreign forces . No war can be fought under the criminal penal code—read this line a hundred times !!
Jurors are generally required to keep their deliberations in strict confidence during the trial and deliberations, and in some jurisdictions even after a verdict is rendered. In English law, the jury's deliberations must never be disclosed outside the jury, even years after the case; to repeat parts of the trial or verdict is considered to be contempt of court, a criminal offense. In the United States, this is usually not the rule, and jurors have sometimes made remarks that called into question whether a verdict was properly reached.
Jurors themselves can be held liable if they deliberately compromise their impartiality. The role of the jury is described as that of a finder of fact, while the judge is seen as having the sole responsibility of interpreting the appropriate law and instructing the jury accordingly. The jury determines the truth or falsity factual allegations and renders a verdict on whether a criminal defendant is guilty, or a civil defendant is civilly liable.
Sometimes a jury makes specific findings of fact in what is called a "special verdict." A verdict without specific findings of fact that includes only findings of guilt, or civil liability and an overall amount of civil damages, if awarded, is called a "general verdict."
There is a school of thought that it may be more difficult to corrupt 12 jurors than one judges. Juries represent the common public and therefore are more likely to judge in line with generally accepted values of the society— say a loyal Gorkha watchman severely wounds a thief.
On the other hand the jury members are more susceptible to the rhetoric impressions and mesmerised by the eloquence of a lawyer than a judge, they tend to be over-awed by the whole experience.
Like Manish Tiwari mouths— Non Sequitor , hare before hound, baby without fu#kin’ bathwater BLAH BLAH
Like Manish Tiwari mouths— Non Sequitor , hare before hound, baby without fu#kin’ bathwater BLAH BLAH
Juries may be swayed by the current prejudices in the society, which are not supported by law.
A judge can order the jury sequestered for the jurors' safety and impartiality. Jurors generally are housed in a suitable hotel or motel for the duration of the trial and deliberations when the judge orders this precaution. When sequestered, jurors are not allowed to have any unmonitored contact with outside sources of information and are not allowed access to the news or other media.
The jury is a body of people, known as jurors, who are sworn to hear the evidence in a legal matter, determine what they believe to be fact and thereby render an impartial verdict.
Take your pick from these below--
Jurors may be tempted to reach a quick verdict in order to get it over with and go home. Juries are not required to give reasons for verdicts, so they could be day dreaming for all you know . Civic duty is indeed a rare opportunity for citizenship. Jurors can become bored and mentally blaned out during the trial. Horrific cases can seriously traumatise jurors who have to sit through harrowing evidence. Many jurors in civil trials involving financial matters do not grasp the evidence presented. The average juror does not understand complex evidence in some trials regardless of his qualifications. It is difficult for jurors to assess the reliability of witnesses or evidence.
George Michael Zimmerman is an American best known for fatally shooting a black Trayvon Martin on February 26, 2012, in Sanford, Florida.
On July 13, 2013, his trial for second-degree murder and manslaughter ended in acquittal. On February 26, 2012, Zimmerman fatally shot 17-year-old African American high school student Trayvon Martin in The Retreat at Twin Lakes community in Sanford, Florida.
Zimmerman was the neighborhood watch coordinator for the gated community where Martin was temporarily staying and where the shooting occurred. The police chief said that Zimmerman was released because there was no evidence to refute Zimmerman's claim of having acted in self-defense, and that under Florida's Stand Your Ground statute, the police were prohibited by law from making an arrest.
The police chief also said that Zimmerman had had a right to defend himself with lethal force. As news of the case spread, thousands of protestors across the country called for Zimmerman's arrest and a full investigation.
Six weeks after the shooting, amid widespread, intense, and in some cases misleading media coverage, Zimmerman was charged with murder by a special prosecutor appointed by Governor Rick Scott.
Zimmerman's trial began on June 10, 2013, in Sanford. On July 13, 2013, a jury acquitted Zimmerman of the charges of second-degree murder and manslaughter. On April 11, 2012, George Zimmerman was charged with second-degree murder in the shooting death of Trayvon Martin.
After sixteen hours of deliberations over the course of two days, on July 13, 2013, the six-person jury ( 5 whites and one non-african ) rendered a not guilty verdict on all counts.
Black in USA believe that the judicial system values the lives of white victims more than the lives of black victims, which is reflected in the varying severity of punishments for the perpetrators.
One month after Martin was slain by Zimmerman in March 2012, Duke University researchers examined records of more than 700 non-capital felony cases in the state from 2000 to 2010. They found what has long been known, that the race of a defendant and victim play a huge role in how a jury is likely to decide a case.
Black defendants by a double digit margin were more likely to be convicted than a white defendant. A major reason for this was that a significant percentage of the jury pools had no blacks on them.
The researchers drew one inescapable conclusion and that's that all-white juries are not only more prone to convict black defendants but that despite court rulings that bar exclusion of jurors or potential jurors because of race, a major number of juror pools and thus juries continue to be all-white.
Watch out for the 2014 bollywood movie release BOMBAY VELVET.
Karan Johar plays Kaizad Khambatta, a flamboyant journalist with a high-end attitude. His Parsi character is quite similar to RKi Karanjia or Rustom Kurshedji Karanjia.
‘Bombay Velvet’ directed by Anurag Kashyap, also stars Ranbir Kapoor, Anushka Sharma and co-produced by Fox Star Studios will release on 25 December 2014.
I WILL TAKE MY FINAL CALL ABOUT DISMANTLING ROTHSCHILD’S COMMUNIST MAN IN INDIA, RK KARANJIA, AFTER SEEING THIS MOVIE.
Rk Karanjia’s investigative journalism was all PAID journalism.
Punch into Google search-
EMBEDDED JOURNALISM , IMMORAL AND FALSE PROPAGANDA BY TRAINED PROFESSIONAL LIARS VADAKAYIL
On the eve of Partition in 1947, RK Karanjia smuggled himself into a crucial meeting of the Chamber of Princes — dressed in full regalia as a prince of a minor state, with Nehru’s and Edwina’s connivance !
Well well—what do you know !
One day someone asked Karanjia, “You say you are a journalist. A journalist must be objective. You have never seen Sai Baba nor talked to him. You know nothing about him and yet you are attacking him. Is this objective journalism?”
This stung Karanjia, and the next thing he did was to come to Puttaparthi. Having come here and seen for himself what was going on, he then sought an audience with Baba, which was given, not merely one but many.
Later Karanjia wrote a book (God Lives in India), completely revising his opinion about Baba.”
Because of his Rothschild connection, R K Karanjia had a distinction of taking interviews with eminent personalities like British Prime Minister late Sir Winston Churchill, French President late Charles De Gaulle, USSR Communists leaders, Chinese Communist leaders , Palestinian leader late Yasser Arafat, Egyptian President late Gamal Abdel Nasser, Yugoslavian President late Josiph Broz Tito, Iranian Emperor late Reza Shah Pahalvi, and Cuban President Fidel Castro – he was particularly fond of.
All those who want to know how Rothschild created Communism--
punch into Google search-
COMMUNISM AND THE JEWS , MAO TSE TUNG AND ROTHSCHILD FUNDS VADAKAYIL
RK Karanjia’s only daughter Rita ran the high-circulation Cine Blitz.
Rita Mehta launched Cine Blitz, it was Karanjia's idea to put a streaking woman on cover for falthu publicty, which later broke her family .
Protima Bedi's son committed suicide n Carnegie Mellon University where he was doing Computer science. Her marriage broke up.
Protima Bedi's son committed suicide n Carnegie Mellon University where he was doing Computer science. Her marriage broke up.
The model was Protima Bedi, who ran nude near Flora Fountain and later at Juhu, and the photo was published in the magazine, an instant hit.
Protima Bedi insisted and got a re-shoot as she wanted the shot when her tits swung UPWARDS.
Protima Bedi insisted and got a re-shoot as she wanted the shot when her tits swung UPWARDS.
RK Karanjia would always spare generous front page space on Blitz for Comminist SA Dange.
Dange, a founding member of Communism in India along with MN Roy, left more than 70 crores when he died to his daughter Roza Deshpande, who was named after Rosa Luxemburg, the Karl Marx propagandist and German Jewess stooge of Rothschild.
Dange, is well known for his stupid book saying that the entire wisdom of Karl Marx is derived from the vaidik Vedanta. But this was a bit too much and there was a furore resulting in poor Dange getting kicked out from the party itself.
Dange was a great follower of Rothschild stooge Gandhi. He was a stooge of the Bolshevik Jews of Russia. M.N. Roy came all the way to Bombay to meet SA Dange. MN Roy and his Jewish honey pot wife Evelyn Trent founded the émigré Communist Party of India on 17 October 1920 in Tashkent.
Today several letters written by MN Roy from Moscow to SA Dange are preserved. Do NOT ever think that these were freedom fighters. SA Dange was funded and sponsored by a money bag , Ranchoddas Bhavan Lotvala, a flour mill owner from Bombay and together they built up a library of Marxist Literature and published translations of classics, with Rothschild’s blessings.
In 1922, with Lotvala's funds , Dange launched the English weekly, Socialist, the first Indian Marxist journal, basically a mouthpiece of Rothschild remote controlled Cominterm, the international communist organization founded in Moscow in March 1919.
As a resolution adopted in the Founding Congress of the Comintern its stated objective was to fight 'by all available means, including armed force, for the overthrow of the international bourgeoisie and for the creation of an international Soviet republic as a transition stage to the complete abolition of the State'
In 1951 four leaders travelled as stowaways from Calcutta port on a Russian ship from Calcutta. They were Ajoy Ghosh , S.A. Dange, C. Rajeswara Rao and M. Basava Punnaiah. These four leaders, two from each centre, were brought to Moscow by political journalist Nikhil Chakravartty, the editor of Mainstream who planned the entire journey. These four leaders met with top CPSU leaders at Moscow.
The first meeting was attended from the Soviet side by Comrades Suslov, Malenkov and Molotov.
On the third day Comrade Stalin made an appearance, and he did so for subsequent days too . Stalin only listened rarely sat at the table but kept pacing up and down smoking his pipe.
Rothschild stooge Stalin told C Rajeshwara Rao that Nehru was too popular to be brought down by a Chinese model revolution .
Stalin told the gruesome foursome that India was not an independent country , but was still ruled indirectly by proxy by British colonialists. This was in 1951, 4 years after our Indian independence.
He said that the Communists could eventually advance only by heading an armed revolution.. ... Stalin discusses the armed Communist struggle whose fountain head was Telengana with C Rajeshwara Rao, whom he knew worshipped himself and Lenin.
Stalin suddenly said the Communist Party of India is sending misleading reports to Moscow on conditions in India, and that he gets his own intelligence reports too. And that put cold water on the heads of the gruesome foursome Indian Communists who went against their own motherland 4 years after Independence.
In May 1991, RK Karanjia did a front page article detailing a meeting of businessmen and other conspirators who wanted to "stop Rajiv at all cost" from returning to power ( leaning towards Russia ) - implying that they would even get him killed. Karanjia's article was so prescient that the very week his article appeared in the paper, Rajiv Gandhi was killed by a human bomb at Sriperumbudur.
Remember Nanavati?
Below: RK Karanjia and his moth eaten bunch of Anglo-indians. He used to do a lip lock when he saw any reporter, to show that he is indeed ZE Don-Juan.
Grace and peace !
CAPT AJIT VADAKAYIL
..
RK Karanjia alleged on many occasions that Narasimha Rao was a beneficiary of Rajiv Gandhi's assassination and worse, that he still kept the company of 'godman' Chandraswami, who was perceived as a major conspirator behind the removal of Rajiv Gandhi.
RK Karanjia sensed the rise of the BJP. He became close to LK Advani. Desperate for relevance Karanjia gave him plenty space in his Blitz newspaper and allowed him to make a clear departure from its earlier Leftist moorings.
He expected BJP to carry him on their shoulders. It did NOT happen.
One find day , RK Karanjia published a front page apology for backing Hindutva and for abandoning the Nehruvian socialist editorial policy .
It cut NO ice.
In the last 10 years of his life RK Karanjia lost his mind. He did NOT even know that his tabloid Blitz had shut down.
Whenever he would come out of this memory loss, for a few minutes he would call his Dy Editor and ask: "What is the story you are doing for the cover page."
That's the only page that mattered to him.
He had made and broken people using this front page, in a immoral and foul manner .
Below: RK Karanjia and his moth eaten bunch of Anglo-indians. He used to do a lip lock when he saw any reporter, to show that he is indeed ZE Don-Juan.
Burjor Khurshedji Karanjia was the younger brother of RK Karanjia.
He was another kingmaker of film stars. BK Karanjia who died last year was the fortnightly film magazine , Filmfare’s editor from 1961 to 1979 .
The Times Group makes no secret of the fact that Filmfare promotes paid content. “If the magazine publishes the photo of a star holding a Louis Vuitton bag, for instance, the company gets paid by the star—how do you like that?
Bollywood stars would bribe heavily to be featured in Filmfare.
They did propaganda with their pimps that if you were in Filmfare,you were a star. If not, you had not arrived.
While RK Karnjia’s CineBlitz’s cover splashed the words “Always unearthing scandals and scoops”, BK Karanjia’s Filmfare stuck to “Another name for credibility”.
BK Karanjia responsibilities included the organization of the annual Filmfare Awards Awards.
Film awards are secured by cash and by kind –if you know what I mean.
I have a piece of advise for all the super arrogant kingmakers .
We are all on a raft flowing down the rapids without a paddle.
One thing is 100% sure-- one day , your raft will plunge down the waterfall , and you will die.
NO amount of money or power can prevent this.
While you are on the raft of life, be graceful,be happy.
Fish , but don't over-fish. What is the point?
Your great grand children will NOT even visit your grave , to piss on it-- leave alone being grateful.
Live and let live.
You cant take your money to the grave ( even the Pharaoh could NOT do that ).
In any case , your money is just a figure on the computer. You can't see it, nor can you count it. You cannot eat more than thrice a day.
You came naked , you will go naked. After the game of life , the KING and the PAWN goes into the same box.
You will be remembered only by your contributions to mankind and this planet.
Rest goes to the garbage bin of history. In this Internet information super highway age, you cant even manipulate the media and shine for a grand obituary..
Remember, there is great joy in being ordinary.
The most valuable things in life are free.
Can any amount of wealth , power , and society pressure , chain the heart of a beautiful princess?
Yes-- take this from me.
Grace and peace !
CAPT AJIT VADAKAYIL
..
0 comments:
Post a Comment